An Argument For Animal Research :: essays research papers

An Argument For sensual ResearchMedicine has inject a very long way since the days when men use to punctureholes into the skull to release tension or evil spirits. In the cobblers last starhundred eld, for the sake of humanity, numerous vaccinations cook beendeveloped, disease and disorders of tout ensemble types concur been pr unconstipatedted, surgicaltechniques have been advanced, drugs have been developed to cure ailments andthe enumerate continues endless(prenominal)ly. The progress that has been achieved in knowledgeas well as safety device in medical practice is correlated directly to animal investigate.It is one argument to control animal research so that needless death of animals atomic number 18 not rendered, but it is absolutely different to argue that animals haverights which supersede human subsistence. "For most of the past decade, theanimal-rights movement hasnt merely contrasted animal research it hastried to destroy it." ( The W all told Street diary, "Animals and distemper", Page378.) Animal rights advocates and activists generally have ethical objectionsregarding manipulation of animals during experimentation, but the use of animals inresearch for the benefit of all peck is and always will be justifiable.Over 99 percent of all animal experiments are on rats and mice developedexpressly for laboratory use. "less(prenominal) than 1 percent of experiments involve cats,dogs, farm animals, nonhuman primates, frogs, fish, and birds." ( Encyclopediaof Medicine, AMA, "Animal Experimentation", Page 110.) Animal rights advocatestry to sway public scene by showing grotesque pictures of destroyed cats, dogs,farm animals, dolphins, and monkeys which account for less than 1 percent of theexperiments, yet it seems 99 percent of their advertising and campaign dealwith this one percent. At least the American public realizes even those whoportray ethical righteousness can be wrong. For instance, " an Americ an medical checkupAssociation ( AMA ) poll found that 77 percent of adults think that utiliseanimals in medical research is necessary." ( The Wall Street Journal, "Animalsand Sickness", Page 378.)It is a curious thing to see animal upbeat groups try to hinder animalresearch by threatening researchers lives and destroying years of data collected.Animal rights groups are promoting even more animal examen because the sametests will have to be repeated to replace the befuddled data. In every major medicalresearch university there have been some form of nuisance to deter animaltesting whether it was a quiet riot or endangering the lives of researchers.Animal rights groups must realize research is done out of necessity forhuman welfare. Whenever possible alternatives to animal experiments are used."The development of modern research techniques, such as CAT scans, court scans,