Arguements For Gun Control Essay -- essays research papers

The violence in todays world, has become modal(a) and common. This violencecauses a staggering number of deaths and injuries throughout the world. The main artillery unit used to engage in violence is the gun. Thats why I want a strict gun dominatepolicy that would endly abolish guns and make the world a safer place. This policy wouldmake it undoable to buy guns and would only eachow hunters to rent guns. By doingthis, violence, related to guns, would greatly and rapidly decrease. On April 20th, 1999, 2 friends from Columbine, Colorado came to school. They had adiabolical jut out to try and kill as many people as possible. They were thoroughly prepared andhad thought out their plan carefully. Together they had 4 guns with them when theybegan their transaction. It resulted in the well-favoredgest gun issue in the U.S. to date. 12students and a teacher were killed, thats not including the 2 killers who committed suicideshortly subsequently the murders. Around 20 others wer e injured. This single act at Columbine game school sparked a question in American society, is our gun control policy strongenough? I say it isnt, with all the deaths and or related to violence in our country today,its nearly nearly impossible to ignore it. I say we assume a genuinely strict gun control policy. An after diasters like Columbine, a dowry of people agree with me. Unfortunately, the regimen just cant burst their fingers and automatically have a gun control policy. Likeall laws and regulations, it must go through recounting and if it gets through that, then it hasto be signed by the president. Many gun control policies and been proposed in congressand most havent even made it through a committee. According to the article GunControl vs. Gun Rights, on www.opensecrets.org, the government only takes action ongun control when a diaster occurs or when a well known figure is killed. In my eyes, thisis entirely true(a) considering that when a normal everyday joe is killed , he doesnt make home(a) headlines. It makes sense however, the people arent personnel casualty to make a big dealout of a guy that they fagt know. overly its a known fact that when it comes to guncontrol, democrats and republicans, split chasten down the middle when it comes to guncontrol. Democrats favor heavy restriction on guns. Republicans sway to wards gunrights and tend to hide behind the 2nd amendment. This results in gridlock (when... ...ssible considering that since the demand would go upand the supply would go way down, few people would be able to smuggle them in fromother countries from very much of money. Also I understand that the hunters in particularwouldnt be happy with this policy. I myself am not a hunter, I dont believe in killingsomething for fun. I do, however, understand that Im from an urban society and wasntraised remotely close to how most people who hunt are raised. Some hunters argue thatits a source of food but its not excerpt food and therefore I wouldnt let hunters keeptheir guns. I know that Im being extremely bias, but I feel very strongly against guns andwhat they are capable of. Dont get me wrong, I know that guns have probably helped uswar most of war weve fought and saved some families from starvation but its todayworld theres just no need for them. I love to argue my point. I also love a challenge. Thats why Ive decided to debatesomeone rest by his own opinion, our founding fathers, and the 2nd amendment ofthe U.S. Constitution. The actricles that Im going to rip apart, is Gun Control Isnt near Guns, Its About Control and 43 to 1, by Mark Howerter.