The Devastating Impact of Weapons of Mass Destruction :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

The Devastating come to of Weapons of Mass Destruction A burning ball was so slick and vivid overhead. Confusion arose when they realized that it was 815 a.m., and that the solarize had already risen that day. The spate of Hiroshima remember that day as the day the sun rose twice (Motro). They ran in a state of panic as the images of peoples shadows were burned into the cement. This mayhem happened all beca wont of the use of a weapon of caboodle destruction.The definition of a weapon of fate destruction is a device, object, or substance that a person intends to use to cause multiple human beings deaths (Vernon). According to this definition, things like nuclear, biological and chemical bombs fall into this category. Many people think that, such brings deserve universal condemnation(biological weapons). The use of weapons of mass destruction is wrong. They are illegal, morally wrong, mentally disturbing, and the effects of the impact stretch forth forever.As far back as do cumented history crumb tell human race were using weapons to kill each other (Ali). When humans first started to make arrows, they were dipping them into animal waste so that the waste would act like poison. Rebehn M.D. writes, The weapon of choice against a civilian enemy became biological, therefore chemical and nuclear, as soon as scientific advancement and technological development make them available.After World War II, the Hague convention was write. This made it illegal to use weapons of mass destruction. The Geneva Convention, another official document, was signed in London, Moscow, and Washington on April 10, 1972. This particular Convention prohibited the use and production of chemical and biological weapons. While this particular document makes it illegal, to the highest degree countries are still accused of making such weapons. Everyone was fearful that the Japanese and Germans were developing such weapons (Ali).In the society that Americans live in, it is not agr eeable to kill another human being. By using biological or chemical agents, people are doing just that. Innocent people comprise themselves caught up in a military struggle for power. The chemical or biological weapons used do not distinguish between soldiers and civilians. commemorate about little babies with open sores all over them or fair so sick that they suffer and eventually die. The use of a invariable bomb would eliminate the suffering that usually occurs after an attack. Furthermore, bombs would not be dropped on civilians anyway.