Introduction to Criminal Justice Essay

This definition of a hatred comes from (Merriam-Webster On-line Dictionary) and reads Crime an act or the commission of an act that is forbidden or the omission of a obligation that is commanded by a public police and that gulls the offender liable to punishment by that law especially a gross violation of the law. There are several definitions of iniquity, but there all reproducible for the about part. People who commit crimes are held to answer for the crimes they are charge of.For this, we mustiness have a discriminatory system in enthr wizard that is lovely and balanced. Although the somebody accused of committing the crime is sometimes judged ahead hes even gone to court, he must be allowed certain(a) rights and due process. Those rights must non be violated prior to a trial. Its this system that makes Ameri batch what we are. Sometimes there are field of studys that make us feel that the person being tried should just be executed or sent to jail, because the med ia has basically tried and convicted the person prior to trial.This was evident in the Casey Anthony murder trial. Most Americans and the media had convicted her prior to trial. She was pitch not conscience-smitten earlier today by twelve jurors. Is the system fair? Who knows, but this is the reason, lots of people believe there should be master key jurors for high profile cases like this. On the other hand our judicial system has been around for a long time and delivers in most cases a fair system of government that protects the innocent, the victims and the accused.Of course all parties elusive dont feel this way establish on where youre at during the judicial process, but its a system thats fair to all parties. The system is over studyn by federal systems that try to wield order and balance throughout the democracy. Without any of this we would be a country with no law and order. Vigilantes would run the streets creating their own laws and chaos would prevail. The three com ponents of the felonious justice system are The Police, The Criminal Courts and The Correctional Institutions.Each one of these components has a very specific function and go hand in hand with one another. For example if a person is reverseed by a police officer for a residential burglary, there is a series of events that go on the law enforcement side, before the laughable goes to court and before he becomes a part of the punitory institutions. .Once an officer confirms a crime has been committed, he must place the person under arrest and channelise there was probable cause to arrest the person.This information goes into a apparent Cause statement thats submitted during the booking process. If the suspect is questioned he must be advised of his Miranda rights by the law enforcement officer. Evidence must be collected to prove the crime was committed and the person being supercharged committed the crime. The suspect is and so transported to the county jail for booking. The officer must hence document the incident in a police enshroud and be able to articulate the elements of the crime have been fulfilled.The evidence must be booked and the police report must then be submitted to the regularize Attorneys office within a 48 min time frame before the suspect is arraigned in court. If any of this fails to happen the courts could release the suspect under Penal Code 825. The case can still be submitted to the District Attorneys office, but it will be filled out of detention. If this process has been comp permited correctly the brutal courts takes over their function. Once the suspect goes to court for his first appearance he is advised of his charges and the probable cause is confirmed by the courts.During this phase the report and evidence collected are examined by the defense counsel to see if the suspect has a chance of winning the case. If the defense attorney feels that his invitee may lose the case based off of the evidence presented he may b e allowed to plea bargain in which the suspect could appeal to a lesser crime or admit guilt to the crime he is accused of. There are several things that determine if this allowed to happen, to allow in the suspects past criminal history and the seriousness of the crime.If the courts feel there is adequacy probable cause and the suspects rights have not been violated, the suspect will be held to answer to the charges brought against him. Otherwise the suspect could be let free based on the lack of probable cause, lack of visible evidence or the suspects rights being violated during the arrest or questioning process. If the suspect is held to answer he will then go to an arraignment. Once there he will plead each not guilty, guilty, or no contest. If a person pleads not guilty he is set for pre-trial at which time his case is handled by the persons lawyer.If need be the case goes to trial where he is judged by twelve of his peers or the person pleads to a lesser charge and the c ase is closed prior to the trial. If a trial takes place and the person is found guilty he will be sentenced by the judge based on the crimes committed. This can be immediately or shortly by and by the trial. If the suspect is sentenced to prison he then becomes a part of the correctional institution. After sentencing he is usually turned over immediately to the custody of the sheriffs department while awaiting transportation to prison.