Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership in Motion

Research is field where many stakeholders are involved. These stakeholders jakes be at the level of biotic community, the government sponsors, research institutions and in usual the research community of the researchers who are spread across the geographies. When a community of researchers share the bonkledge with individually other there are oftentimes instances where some part of knowledge transfer does not happen completely. This raises a situation of lacuna in knowledge transfer where some aggroup members within the project are unaware of some aspects of the project.This happened with our group as well. We were undergoing through a long period of a lack in knowledge share where team members were finding it difficult to give notice (of) the fresh development to separately other. The shortage in time and involvement with other commitments in addition made it difficult to update the peers on the research activities twain internal and external. As social theorists have said that learning is a lifelong process and it takes a whole life time in learning the social interactions and mastering the art of interaction.By this they have also postulated that the art of interaction set up be understood near effectively when whizz is within the social domain and has opportunity to have a conversation ( acquit) with the signifi whoremongert others (Graham, 2004). This theory somehow contradicts the theory where the experts say that the electronic figurer managed interaction or CMI is also to an extent able to replicate the conversation process. The boom of social networking sites has made it possible to replicate the social mental synthesis over internet.An added advantage of this kind of a model is that it allows one to communicate with the user generated content and allows oneself to give the comments and feedback without necessarily feeling comprehensive about(predicate) getting an immediate interaction. This way people can connect with each othe r in the cyber space and also connect at one to one level at a later stage when they can meet. Our Approach Analysis As is a commonly stated detail that complex learnings are often associated with groups and addressed more than effectively at the group level, even we tried the same scheme while learning in our group.Burdett (2003) postulates that learning in groups provide opportunities for students to pull off meaning, manipulate ideas, and create their own knowledge skills that correspond to those needed in the wider society. We initiated the group learning by first organising a group and formation the group membership in order to increase the group tackiness (Hirokowa, 1999). The next step was to define the group goals. For doing so we together formulate the group goals based on the available information, resources and incorporated them with the ways we can accomplish the goals by using these resources.The next step was very essential which was to regulate our performan ce continuously. This regulation was important in terms to know the demandion we are progressing with the right and realistic aims and goals and if are able to achieve the desired goals or not. This was also a stage for us to replicate on the accomplished tasks and goals and to forms new deadliness and also to update each other on each other performance by the sum of giving the feedback.This strategy worked the best out of the other two strategies of confabulation and interaction as well as this was the strategy where maximum inwardness of conversation of involved. The online system also worked very well with our team. The computer managed interaction (CMI) as it is called also did set a greater level of communication up to a certain level. This communication was through the mode of computer mediated interaction which though not being a direct form of communication was highly popular.This enabled the group members to share the thoughts and share the knowledge in the more virtu al form which enabled the group members to be in par with the new development and also a much improve knowledge transfer was enabled by this way. Conclusion From our experience we found that the most effective way of keeping a communication was a direct way of communicating where face to face interaction was involved. This also helped the team members to remain in personal contacts with each other.